Infrastructure that separates vehicles and cycling is especially effective for safety and mode shift. Among many examples looked at by the research team was a programme in Seville, Spain where a network of 200 kilometres of traffic-separated cycle lanes was built between 2006 and 2011.
Car trips in Seville decreased by almost nine percent during that period. Cycling and public transport use both increased by four percent. The cycling injury rate dropped like a stone – from 1.82 per 100,000 trips to 0.55 - and deaths and serious injuries from cycling almost halved.
With walking, designing safe routes makes all the difference for mode shift and safety. A USD$1.2 billion Safe Routes to School programme in the US between 2005 and 2012 resulted in 13 percent increase in walking and cycling to school. There was a 44 percent reduction in the rate of injury for school-aged pedestrians during school travel hours.
A safe route to transit programme in Ruse, Bulgaria involving separated cycleways, improved LED lighting, video surveillance, a park and ride facility and 'good night' trolley bus, resulted in a 20 percent drop in car use, 15 percent increase in walking and cycling, and 20 percent increase in public transport use. Another safe route to transit programme - in San Francisco - saw an uptake in walking and bus use. Cyclists also reported feeling safer.
Locally, a transport engineering and community education project in Nelson saw a 22 percent increase in pedestrian traffic in the CBD, a reduction in pedestrian / cyclist crashes, and a 7 percent reduction in reported crime. Elsewhere, a project in Rosehill, Auckland involving traffic calming and speed limit reductions had 76 percent of people surveyed saying they felt safer. Plus, there was a 44 percent increase in people saying they used at least one active mode of travel – mostly walking.