A mining-focused white paper on geochemical carbon dioxide removal (CDR) pathways, real-world deployment, Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV), and feasibility considerations for operators.

Mining operations are intensifying decarbonization efforts, yet hard to abate emissions persist. Geochemical carbon dioxide removal (CDR) pathways present a durable, scalable solution with the added potential for value creation. My hope is that our white paper will help facilitate meaningful dialogue on deploying CDR across the mining industry.
img-mb-close-up-tailings-pond
As a mining company, we have resources we can deploy directly to address our own carbon. Developing carbon removal projects internally is more credible for us than simply buying offsets, especially when it comes to managing residual emissions.
img-winding-path-open-cast-mine
MRV is what builds trust. It’s how we show, scientifically and transparently, that a tonne of CO₂ has actually been removed and durably stored, and that the claim stands up to scrutiny.

No. CDR is positioned as a complement to emissions reduction for residual/hard-to-abate emissions.

The pathways covered store CO₂ in long-lived forms such as solid carbonates or dissolved inorganic carbon.

Credible crediting and buyer confidence depend on robust monitoring, transparent reporting, and third-party verification.

Potential impacts on tailings/geochemistry and geotechnical performance, EoR concurrence, and closure constraints vary by pathway.

Monetization today is possible within voluntary markets; compliance markets are evolving and will require regulatory changes to allow the use of these credits.

* Required fields